Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 00:00
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
'Disconnected' tyre should force Spanish GP strategy variety - The Race
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
What kind of lights would you like to use for your home decor?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The closer a volcano is to erupting, the greener the trees around it look from space - Live Science
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Which job has the potential to become rich easily?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Magic Johnson Bluntly Blames Two Players for Knicks' Season-Ending Loss - Sports Illustrated
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Satellite Pics Show How Russia Tried To Avert Ukraine Drone Strikes, But Failed - NDTV
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.